Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Iniciar sesión or Registrarse.



Tema nuevo Postear respuesta
#1 Publicado : jueves, 29 de octubre de 2020 05:15:09 a.m.(UTC)

Posición: Advanced Member

Grupos: Registered
Registrado: 13/08/2020(UTC)
Mensajes: 55

Big Tech's decions to block some posts and videos while letting other content viewed as inflammatory proliferate have drawn the ire of Republicans and Democrats alike, raing the prospect that a 24-year-old U.S. law that fostered the internet's exploon will be pared back.While many Republicans call for the repeal of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, Democrats would prefer targeted, rgical revion of the law protecting Facebook and Twitter from being ed for content posted by ers.Predent Donald Trump and top Republicans, angered by what they allege slotxo tech companies' censorship of conservative ideas, say the legal shield has outlived its efulne. That thinking was on full dplay at a hearing held to dcs the law on Wednesday.

Democrats have also taken aim at the law becae they claim it fails to tackle widespread minformation and hate. But they argue the law important to free speech online and want a more deliberate and moderate approach to reform.Democratic predential nominee Joe Biden has called for "revoking" the law, but many believe he will be more receptive to ideas from congreional Democrats if he wins the election.Multiple Democratic lawmakers said in interviews that they oppose repeal of Section 230, which allows companies to take down or leave material on their platforms without the rk of facing lawits.

"Repealing it outright not viable," Representative Anna Eshoo, a Democrat from California said. She has introduced leglation to remove tech companies' liability protections if their algorithms amplify harmful, radicalizing content that leads to offline violence. She advocated ing "a scalpel instead of a jackhammer to reform the critical statute."The approach has also found pport from Virginia's Democratic Senator Joe Manchin, according to a staffer. Manchin's bill, which co-sponsored by Republican John Cornyn, aims to stop the sale of opioids and illicit drugs online by amending 230 protections. It reqres companies to report spicio activity to law enforcement or be held liable for that failure.An aide to Senator Ron Wyden, a Democrat from Oregon who originally co-authored Section 230, said the senator urges caution on steps that could limit free speech online. "He n't saying no one can ever change a word of Section 230, but that politicians need to be very careful when it comes to tinkering with foundational laws around speech and the internet," the aide said.Meanwhile tech trade groups over the past year began an aggreive lobbying effort against changing the law and view calls for repeal as draconian."I do expect the more extreme statements on wanting a full repeal to die down... the Democrats are walking that kind of rhetoric back," said Carl Szabo, general counsel for Netchoice - a trade group that counts Google, Facebook and Twitter among its members.


There an array of proposals on Capitol Hill. Most of the bills that have found Democratic sponsors seek to change protections for harmful conduct on online platforms like crime, rather than on er speech.Leglation from Senator Richard Blumenthal, a Democrat, and Republican Senator Lindsey Graham goes after online child pornography. Companies that do not detect ch images would lose their 230 immunity. The leglation, however, has been criticized by civil rights groups as infringing privacy of ordinary ers. Democratic Senator Brian Schatz and Senate No. 2 Republican John Thune propose another bill that would reqre platforms to explain their content screening practices in everyday language, notify ers of content rejection within 14 days and allow appeals.

Matt Perault, director at the Duke Univerty's Center for Science and Technology Policy, said the U.S. election has given momentum to calls for revoking Section 230, which would radically alter the nature of online expreion.

"No matter the outcome of the election, I think Section 230 reform will be on the agenda next Congre," Representative Eshoo said.
Respuesta Rápida Mostrar Respuesta Rápida
Usuarios navegando este tema
Guest (2)
Tema nuevo Postear respuesta
Salto de foro  
Puedes iniciar nuevos temas en este foro.
Puedes responder a temas en este foro.
Puedes eliminar sus temas en este foro.
Puedes editar sus temas en este foro.
No puedes crear encuestas en este foro.
Puedes votar las encuestas en este foro.